FreeBSD print  : hugelatex
LaTeX format files with large limits
LaTeX format files with large limits needed e.g. by jadetex
to process files converted from SGML.
#
|
hugelatex history
v. 1.10
date: 2007/05/19 20:21:04; author: flz; state: Exp; lines: +1 -0
- Welcome X.org 7.2 \o/.
- Set X11BASE to ${LOCALBASE} for recent ${OSVERSION}.
- Bump PORTREVISION for ports intalling files in ${X11BASE}.
v. 1.9
date: 2005/11/04 00:55:50; author: edwin; state: Exp; lines: +5 -5
In post-install, remove log files[*] generated during the installation phase.
[*] after discussions on irc about what the .fmt files are.
v. 1.8
date: 2005/09/19 15:27:13; author: linimon; state: Exp; lines: +1 -1
Reset maintainer at his request. From the email:
It is not clear to me if it is a needed port anyway, so I'd be skeptical
of patches that "fix it". It may be obviated completely by more recent
teTeX distributions.
v. 1.7
date: 2005/07/23 02:53:33; author: kris; state: Exp; lines: +2 -0
This port is scheduled for deletion on 2005-09-22 if it is still broken
at that time and no PRs have been submitted to fix it.
v. 1.6
date: 2005/03/26 19:51:38; author: kris; state: Exp; lines: +2 -0
BROKEN: Incomplete pkg-plist
Approved by: portmgr (self)
v. 1.5
date: 2003/10/16 21:59:50; author: linimon; state: Exp; lines: +0 -2
Fix PLIST and unbreak. Note, however, Murray's email to me:
I'm not sure that my original goals for hugelatex even make sense any
more, and that the port is still needed. Does it properly work with
larger documents that the default won't work with? [If not,] the port
should simply be removed.
I don't know enough about LaTeX to know that answer to that one. Could
LaTeX users weigh in on this?
PR: ports/50094, ports/51837
Submitted by: Volker Stolz, Alex Dupre
Approved by: murray (maintainer)
v. 1.4
date: 2003/05/06 07:16:55; author: kris; state: Exp; lines: +2 -0
BROKEN: Bad pkg-plist
v. 1.3
date: 2003/03/07 06:09:03; author: ade; state: Exp; lines: +1 -0
Clear moonlight beckons.
Requiem mors pacem pkg-comment,
And be calm ports tree.
E Nomini Patri, E Fili, E Spiritu Sancti.
v. 1.2
date: 2002/01/29 11:48:48; author: knu; state: Exp; lines: +1 -1
Use ${ECHO_CMD} instead of ${ECHO} where you mean the echo command;
the ECHO macro is set to "echo" by default, but it is set to "true" if
make(1) is invoked with the -s option while ECHO_CMD is always set to
the echo command.
v. 1.1
date: 2001/09/08 01:06:03; author: murray; state: Exp;
Add hugelatex, a meta-port for teTeX that builds a version of latex
with higher default limits.
Obtained from: NetBSD
=============================================================================
v. 1.10
date: 2007/05/19 20:21:04; author: flz; state: Exp; lines: +1 -0
- Welcome X.org 7.2 \o/.
- Set X11BASE to ${LOCALBASE} for recent ${OSVERSION}.
- Bump PORTREVISION for ports intalling files in ${X11BASE}.
v. 1.9
date: 2005/11/04 00:55:50; author: edwin; state: Exp; lines: +5 -5
In post-install, remove log files[*] generated during the installation phase.
[*] after discussions on irc about what the .fmt files are.
v. 1.8
date: 2005/09/19 15:27:13; author: linimon; state: Exp; lines: +1 -1
Reset maintainer at his request. From the email:
It is not clear to me if it is a needed port anyway, so I'd be skeptical
of patches that "fix it". It may be obviated completely by more recent
teTeX distributions.
v. 1.7
date: 2005/07/23 02:53:33; author: kris; state: Exp; lines: +2 -0
This port is scheduled for deletion on 2005-09-22 if it is still broken
at that time and no PRs have been submitted to fix it.
v. 1.6
date: 2005/03/26 19:51:38; author: kris; state: Exp; lines: +2 -0
BROKEN: Incomplete pkg-plist
Approved by: portmgr (self)
v. 1.5
date: 2003/10/16 21:59:50; author: linimon; state: Exp; lines: +0 -2
Fix PLIST and unbreak. Note, however, Murray's email to me:
I'm not sure that my original goals for hugelatex even make sense any
more, and that the port is still needed. Does it properly work with
larger documents that the default won't work with? [If not,] the port
should simply be removed.
I don't know enough about LaTeX to know that answer to that one. Could
LaTeX users weigh in on this?
PR: ports/50094, ports/51837
Submitted by: Volker Stolz, Alex Dupre
Approved by: murray (maintainer)
v. 1.4
date: 2003/05/06 07:16:55; author: kris; state: Exp; lines: +2 -0
BROKEN: Bad pkg-plist
v. 1.3
date: 2003/03/07 06:09:03; author: ade; state: Exp; lines: +1 -0
Clear moonlight beckons.
Requiem mors pacem pkg-comment,
And be calm ports tree.
E Nomini Patri, E Fili, E Spiritu Sancti.
v. 1.2
date: 2002/01/29 11:48:48; author: knu; state: Exp; lines: +1 -1
Use ${ECHO_CMD} instead of ${ECHO} where you mean the echo command;
the ECHO macro is set to "echo" by default, but it is set to "true" if
make(1) is invoked with the -s option while ECHO_CMD is always set to
the echo command.
v. 1.1
date: 2001/09/08 01:06:03; author: murray; state: Exp;
Add hugelatex, a meta-port for teTeX that builds a version of latex
with higher default limits.
Obtained from: NetBSD
=============================================================================
v. 1.10
date: 2007/05/19 20:21:04; author: flz; state: Exp; lines: +1 -0
- Welcome X.org 7.2 \o/.
- Set X11BASE to ${LOCALBASE} for recent ${OSVERSION}.
- Bump PORTREVISION for ports intalling files in ${X11BASE}.
v. 1.9
date: 2005/11/04 00:55:50; author: edwin; state: Exp; lines: +5 -5
In post-install, remove log files[*] generated during the installation phase.
[*] after discussions on irc about what the .fmt files are.
v. 1.8
date: 2005/09/19 15:27:13; author: linimon; state: Exp; lines: +1 -1
Reset maintainer at his request. From the email:
It is not clear to me if it is a needed port anyway, so I'd be skeptical
of patches that "fix it". It may be obviated completely by more recent
teTeX distributions.
v. 1.7
date: 2005/07/23 02:53:33; author: kris; state: Exp; lines: +2 -0
This port is scheduled for deletion on 2005-09-22 if it is still broken
at that time and no PRs have been submitted to fix it.
v. 1.6
date: 2005/03/26 19:51:38; author: kris; state: Exp; lines: +2 -0
BROKEN: Incomplete pkg-plist
Approved by: portmgr (self)
v. 1.5
date: 2003/10/16 21:59:50; author: linimon; state: Exp; lines: +0 -2
Fix PLIST and unbreak. Note, however, Murray's email to me:
I'm not sure that my original goals for hugelatex even make sense any
more, and that the port is still needed. Does it properly work with
larger documents that the default won't work with? [If not,] the port
should simply be removed.
I don't know enough about LaTeX to know that answer to that one. Could
LaTeX users weigh in on this?
PR: ports/50094, ports/51837
Submitted by: Volker Stolz, Alex Dupre
Approved by: murray (maintainer)
v. 1.4
date: 2003/05/06 07:16:55; author: kris; state: Exp; lines: +2 -0
BROKEN: Bad pkg-plist
v. 1.3
date: 2003/03/07 06:09:03; author: ade; state: Exp; lines: +1 -0
Clear moonlight beckons.
Requiem mors pacem pkg-comment,
And be calm ports tree.
E Nomini Patri, E Fili, E Spiritu Sancti.
v. 1.2
date: 2002/01/29 11:48:48; author: knu; state: Exp; lines: +1 -1
Use ${ECHO_CMD} instead of ${ECHO} where you mean the echo command;
the ECHO macro is set to "echo" by default, but it is set to "true" if
make(1) is invoked with the -s option while ECHO_CMD is always set to
the echo command.
v. 1.1
date: 2001/09/08 01:06:03; author: murray; state: Exp;
Add hugelatex, a meta-port for teTeX that builds a version of latex
with higher default limits.
Obtained from: NetBSD
=============================================================================
|
